<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: starUML and argoUML &#8211; compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/</link>
	<description>Java / Web developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:28:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Deans</title>
		<link>http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-45824</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Deans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 14:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=145#comment-45824</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used ArgoUML for a few years - hard to believe is STILL isn&#039;t developed entirely. I love the fact that it&#039;s free to use at it&#039;s fullest capacity but I can&#039;t get over it&#039;s ugliness. I much prefer the style of the diagrams in other products that I usually wind up using instead. Last year I was using the community edition of Visual Paradigm, which I love but I hate the watermarks... This year I&#039;m using StarUML, which I think is the best unobstructed and free UML tool I&#039;ve found yet.

I keep going back to ArgoUML because of it&#039;s popularity - maybe I&#039;m missing something. Which is how I got here. Overall, I have to say ArgoUML is good, but for me StarUML rules - now if they can just export to SVG I would never have to look for anything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used ArgoUML for a few years &#8211; hard to believe is STILL isn&#8217;t developed entirely. I love the fact that it&#8217;s free to use at it&#8217;s fullest capacity but I can&#8217;t get over it&#8217;s ugliness. I much prefer the style of the diagrams in other products that I usually wind up using instead. Last year I was using the community edition of Visual Paradigm, which I love but I hate the watermarks&#8230; This year I&#8217;m using StarUML, which I think is the best unobstructed and free UML tool I&#8217;ve found yet.</p>
<p>I keep going back to ArgoUML because of it&#8217;s popularity &#8211; maybe I&#8217;m missing something. Which is how I got here. Overall, I have to say ArgoUML is good, but for me StarUML rules &#8211; now if they can just export to SVG I would never have to look for anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veera</title>
		<link>http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-9221</link>
		<dc:creator>Veera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 06:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=145#comment-9221</guid>
		<description>have heard about BoUML. need to give it a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have heard about BoUML. need to give it a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal Slonina</title>
		<link>http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-9197</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal Slonina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=145#comment-9197</guid>
		<description>VP cons:
-  free version doesn&#039;t do uml  code conversion

The best UML tool around for me is  BoUML.
Pros:
- free/open souce
- solid
- fast
- UML 2.0
- good UMLcode round-trip
- packages for almost every linux distro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VP cons:<br />
-  free version doesn&#8217;t do uml  code conversion</p>
<p>The best UML tool around for me is  BoUML.<br />
Pros:<br />
- free/open souce<br />
- solid<br />
- fast<br />
- UML 2.0<br />
- good UMLcode round-trip<br />
- packages for almost every linux distro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: danny0085</title>
		<link>http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-2504</link>
		<dc:creator>danny0085</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=145#comment-2504</guid>
		<description>VP Suite 4.1 for  Linux 

http://tips-linux.net/en/content/visual-paradigm-suite-41-linux-license</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VP Suite 4.1 for  Linux </p>
<p><a href="http://tips-linux.net/en/content/visual-paradigm-suite-41-linux-license" rel="nofollow">http://tips-linux.net/en/content/visual-paradigm-suite-41-linux-license</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron</title>
		<link>http://veerasundar.com/blog/2008/11/staruml-and-argouml-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=145#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why anyone would recommend a UML tool that fails to parse valid syntax during reverse engineering. It&#039;s one thing if additional features such as generics are discarded by the reverse engineering feature. But StarUML completely discards a class when it encounters any generics in the code. This makes the reverse engineering feature totally unusable. 

Generics have been around for 5 years now, and current applications commonly make use of it. I have generics in nearly all my java code. StarUML should be considered obsolete until generics are at least recognized by the parser. Meanwhile, I&#039;ll be looking for another UML tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why anyone would recommend a UML tool that fails to parse valid syntax during reverse engineering. It&#8217;s one thing if additional features such as generics are discarded by the reverse engineering feature. But StarUML completely discards a class when it encounters any generics in the code. This makes the reverse engineering feature totally unusable. </p>
<p>Generics have been around for 5 years now, and current applications commonly make use of it. I have generics in nearly all my java code. StarUML should be considered obsolete until generics are at least recognized by the parser. Meanwhile, I&#8217;ll be looking for another UML tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

