Comments on: Setting up a Subversion server in Windows using VisualSVN http://veerasundar.com/blog/2009/06/setting-up-a-subversion-server-in-windows-using-visualsvn/ Sun, 14 Mar 2010 07:43:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Veera http://veerasundar.com/blog/2009/06/setting-up-a-subversion-server-in-windows-using-visualsvn/comment-page-1/#comment-2415 Veera Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:29:45 +0000 http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=524#comment-2415 @Domino Thanks for the information. @Domino

Thanks for the information.

]]> By: domino http://veerasundar.com/blog/2009/06/setting-up-a-subversion-server-in-windows-using-visualsvn/comment-page-1/#comment-2414 domino Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:14:51 +0000 http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=524#comment-2414 Hi Veera, just stumbled apon a tweet from Scott Hanselman about a new product SVNIsapi (http://www.svnisapi.com) which allows hosting a Subversion repository via IIS, without an SVNSERVE daemon or an Apache Server. Cheers Hi Veera,

just stumbled apon a tweet from Scott Hanselman about a new product SVNIsapi (http://www.svnisapi.com) which allows hosting a Subversion repository via IIS, without an SVNSERVE daemon or an Apache Server.

Cheers

]]> By: Garrett Serack http://veerasundar.com/blog/2009/06/setting-up-a-subversion-server-in-windows-using-visualsvn/comment-page-1/#comment-694 Garrett Serack Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:49:10 +0000 http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=524#comment-694 >> Subversion is a bad focus in today’s setup. Mercurial / Git are the right idea. I don't really agree. It depends on what you're looking for. Personally, I *love* git, and at the same time *love* Subversion. For a singular project, I'm leaning to preferring git. For a collection of projects, I lean towards Subversion. Plus, Subversion is good for other things past versioning source code. I use Subversion to version and sync my documents, favorite utilities, and other things--this would not be as convenient with git. The other reason I stopped by was to point readers towards a utility I wrote which allows you to expose VisualSVN via IIS on Windows (which, if you've already got an external facing website on IIS, is extremely useful). SvnReverseProxy can be found at http://gstoolkit.codeplex.com/Wiki/View.aspx?title=SvnReverseProxy >> Subversion is a bad focus in today’s setup. Mercurial / Git are the right idea.

I don’t really agree. It depends on what you’re looking for. Personally, I *love* git, and at the same time *love* Subversion.

For a singular project, I’m leaning to preferring git. For a collection of projects, I lean towards Subversion. Plus, Subversion is good for other things past versioning source code.

I use Subversion to version and sync my documents, favorite utilities, and other things–this would not be as convenient with git.

The other reason I stopped by was to point readers towards a utility I wrote which allows you to expose VisualSVN via IIS on Windows (which, if you’ve already got an external facing website on IIS, is extremely useful).

SvnReverseProxy can be found at http://gstoolkit.codeplex.com/Wiki/View.aspx?title=SvnReverseProxy

]]> By: Shantanu Kumar http://veerasundar.com/blog/2009/06/setting-up-a-subversion-server-in-windows-using-visualsvn/comment-page-1/#comment-676 Shantanu Kumar Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:12:37 +0000 http://veerasundar.com/blog/?p=524#comment-676 Subversion is a bad focus in today's setup. Mercurial / Git are the right idea. Subversion is a bad focus in today’s setup. Mercurial / Git are the right idea.

]]>